Note: This article is part of a series on Old Testament Christophanies. For important background information, see An Introduction to Old Testament Christophanies–with Justin Martyr.
The Covenantor
Genesis 12 opens with the central passage of the book, where the Lord first came to direct Abram’s path:
Now the LORD said to Abram,
“Go forth from your country,
And from your relatives
And from your father’s house,
To the land which I will show you;
And I will make you a great nation,
And I will bless you,
And make your name great;
And so you shall be a blessing;
And I will bless those who bless you,
And the one who curses you I will curse.
And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed” (Gen 12:1–3).
The Lord’s command that Abram travel to the land and the resulting promises make up the Abrahamic Covenant. One of the promises is that the Lord would make Abram a great nation. But by the beginning of chapter 15, he was yet to sire an heir even though he and his wife Sarai were old. Verse 1 is the first time in the Bible we find the extraordinary phrase “the word of the Lord.” The Word wasn’t something said to Abram; it was someone speaking to him. The Word came to Abram in a vision, saying, “Do not fear, Abram, I am a shield to you; Your reward shall be very great” (v. 1). Abram asked what his reward would be since he was so far childless. The Word of the Lord answered by promising him as many descendants as there are stars in the heavens (vv. 2–5). Abram’s response changed everything:
Then he believed in the Lord; and He reckoned it to him as righteousness. (Gen 15:6)
It was this singular act of faith that was the basis for why the Lord chose Abram to become the great patriarch of God’s people. It wasn’t the promise itself that Abram believed in, but the Promiser.
Now look at how the targumim handle Genesis 15:6:
And he believed in the Word of the Lord, and He reckoned it to him unto justification. (Onkelos)
And he believed in the Lord, and had faith in the Word of the Lord, and He reckoned it to him for righteousness, because he parleyed not before him with words. (Jonathan)
Astonishing! Abram placed his faith in the Word of the Lord, the Son of God. And when he did so, the Lord credited it to him as righteousness. Simple as that. None of Abram’s works earned, or helped to earn, him righteousness. Rather, it was his faith in the Lord that led to the Messiah’s righteousness being imputed upon him. It is no wonder that Paul looked to Abraham as his cardinal example of one who was saved by grace through faith alone (Rom 4; Gal 3:6–14).
Abraham did indeed become the father of many nations, including the descendants of the sons of Isaac [the Israelites through Jacob and the Edomites through Esau]; the generations of Ishmael; and the descendants of the sons he sired with his second wife Keturah. Abraham’s children also include all those who have placed their full trust in the Lord Jesus (Rom 4:11; Gal 3:7, 29; cf. Matt 3:9). They may not physically descend from their forefather, but more importantly, they take after him by following his example. Abraham was blessed with so many children, both physical and spiritual, that they are as difficult to count as the dust of the earth, as the sand on the seashore, and as the stars in the heavens (e.g., Gen 13:16; 15:5; 22:17; Heb 11:12).
A Flaming Torch
The Lord told Abram that He had brought him out of the Ur of the Chaldeans to the land that He had given him. Abram asked how he could know that he would possess it. The Lord then instructed the patriarch to bring Him a three year old heifer, a three year old female goat, a three year old ram, a turtledove, and a young pigeon. Except for the birds, each of them was cut in half and the pieces were placed opposite one another, so that there were two parallel rows of slain animals (vv. 7–10).
What a most unusual scene this is to us in the modern era, but to Abram the meaning was clear. The idea is that the two parties entering into a covenant agreement would walk through the rows. If either party was to break the agreement, then they too would be severed as the animals were. There is a similar ceremony referred to in Jeremiah 34:18–20, where various leaders and people in the land entered into a covenant by passing through the halves of a calf. They didn’t honor their commitments, and so God handed them over to their enemies—their bodies to be feasted upon by birds and beasts. The covenant breakers were cut down, just as the calf was.
It is easy to understand why English translations along the lines of “make a covenant” are often based on the Hebrew kārat berît, which literally means to “cut a covenant.” Even today we may metaphorically say that we are “cutting a deal” when entering into a contract or agreement. But the ancient covenants of the Near East quite often involved the actual spilling of blood. And life is in the blood (Lev 17:11).
As the sun was setting, Abram fell into a deep sleep (v. 12), similar to the one the Lord brought upon Adam so that his rib could be removed to create Eve (Gen 2:21). When the sun had set, it became very dark, and what appeared to be a smoking fire pot and a flaming torch passed between the animal rows (v. 17). Familiar imagery was used to describe the unfamiliar—the glory of the Lord burning brightly from His presence. The Lord personally appeared to complete the ceremony, sealing the covenant. Now, even if Abram or his offspring were to break the covenant, then the Lord alone would suffer the consequences. The Lord would be cut. And so He was—on the cross. You see, it was Jesus who walked through the bloody pieces, laying the foundation for His redemptive death. Abram placed his full trust in the Lord, and in response, the Son caused the patriarch to fall asleep so that He could place the entirety of the covenant’s burden upon Himself.
The chapter concludes with the dimensions of the covenant land being given:
On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying,
“To your descendants I have given this land,
From the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates:the Kenite and the Kenizzite and the Kadmonite and the Hittite and the Perizzite and the Rephaim and the Amorite and the Canaanite and the Girgashite and the Jebusite” (Gen 15:18–21).
This is the territory that would come to be known as the Promised Land. The promise that the land belonged to Abram’s descendants would later be a principal reason for the Son of God to visit several of them.
The Genesis 15 Christophany/Messiahophany is especially helpful in underscoring how the Abrahamic Covenant is the root from which the New Covenant grows (Rom 11:16–18). Both are so plainly unconditional. Regardless of what Abraham and the children of the promise did—or will do—the covenant couldn’t be nullified. For the Lord Himself took on all the responsibility. Abraham’s descendants broke the covenant, but it was the Lord alone, Jesus Christ, who was pierced. He spilled out His blood, giving His life for those who broke the covenant. He became the Savior of Israel, and therefore, the Savior of the world. Through Abraham’s seed, the world was truly blessed just as the Lord promised him. Jesus bore the punishment for mankind, becoming a curse (Gal 3:13) and switching places with the sinner (2 Cor 5:21) who trusts in Him with the same simple faith that Abraham held.
YHWH certainly ratified his covenant with Abraham. Gen. 15:8, Abram said, “Adonai YHWH, how shall I know that I will inherit?” Gen. 15:18, “On the same day YHWH made a covenant with Abram.” The ratification by the smoking oven and burning torch, symbols representing YHWH, happened between these verses. YHWH is the name of the Trinity in the OT, so God the Son was certainly present. But Jesus wasn’t present. Jesus wasn’t on the scene until God the Son joined himself with Jesus of Nazareth in the incarnation,about 1870 years after YHWH ratified his covenant with Abraham.
Surely you don’t think I don’t know that? Please read the article and the linked article at the top. I often refer to Christophies as “Jesus” to underscore the point that this is the Word to a general audience. We often do this in normal speech, such as when we refer to “Abraham” even though we may be referencing a time when he was still “Abram.” It’s quite acceptable in academic writings as well so long as it’s clear what the author intends.
Very good analysis and interpretation. Clearer now than ever. God has always held out His offer of justification in love and by grace.
Thank you dear brother.
Another well written article, clearly explained with a very accurate interpretation. Well done, Matthew.
Loved this. Thank you. I will be sharing on FB.
Thank you so much.